I think it’s apples and oranges. When I read a magazine, I don’t watch commercials. What cool logos on cars. Yes, it is a form of advertising. How do you compare this to in-content ads? Unattainable.
In-content advertising costs you time. You can’t fire him. You have to look or turn away (with the sound off?). The latter takes a lot of effort (and you don’t know exactly when your content starts and your ad ends), so you can stay put. However, it takes your time and listen And He sees something.
It’s not quite comparable to all the examples I’ve given that take no time, where you hear nothing and only see something that’s completely optional/skippable.
Not us no Used to pay for advertising. Comparing clothes to a brand makes no sense at all. Am I the only one (because you get a +1) who doesn’t understand this comparison?
And the target group talking about ads (I know them too “Did you see that in the ad?”), this is what ads are made for and these people are looking for evidence of ads (and are probably willing to pay for it ;-)). But I think this group is getting smaller and smaller.
Personally, I think that young people in particular are seeing more and more ads (from so-called “influencers”) but are not noticing it properly. To view this content (without YT commercials), you need a premium YT account. This way I prefer to say; We pay for the commercials! 
[Reactie gewijzigd door nijntje82 op 24 juni 2024 20:16]
“Coffee buff. Twitter fanatic. Tv practitioner. Social media advocate. Pop culture ninja.”
More Stories
Strong increase in gas export pipeline from Norway to Europe
George Louis Bouchez still puts Julie Tatton on the list.
Thai Air Force wants Swedish Gripen 39 fighter jets