His way of thinking. He’s already steps ahead of a lot of people and sees things that others don’t (want) to see.
I asked a simple question on ChatGPT in PowerShell about asterisks
to be interpreted as literal and the answer was simply wrong.
The younger generation trusts and relies on this technology. This could mean the end of our progressive evolution if we all stop thinking for ourselves.
Knowledge is evolution. Through compulsory education we transfer knowledge to our next generation. Life is ending and short, and for our legacy you are responsible for that.
Elon Musk understands this, he realized that ChatGPT just wants to be politically correct and gives answers that are incorrect in the broader sense. This is a danger to our evolution.
It happens to me a lot; You sit in a room with others and think about a particular topic differently than someone else. Most of them choose to make a compromise that hurts themselves or even turns on others. The reason is often acceptance by others, but acceptance is bidirectional.
This also happens a lot here on Tweakers; Your answer differs from the answers of many others and is viewed negatively by the majority. But in reality, your point of view will not be taken seriously, especially if the person judging you negatively does not explain to you why he or she is doing so. You feel like the coworker who talks bad about you to others, but never says so to you.
Just notice how often opinions, strong statements, private insinuations, and prejudices are shared in responses without any valid evidence. And imagine that ChatGPT uses this information as well.
This is exactly what Elon Musk wants to differentiate from X. This is also what Elon Musk warns about in ChatGPT. ChatGPT is a beautiful thing, provided it presents itself in the right way, completely neutral, unbiased, without political interference, and based only on facts. It does not surprise me that the situation in the room at OpenAI also happened and hence I understand Elon Musk’s choice
very good.
[Reactie gewijzigd door DJanmaat op 13 juni 2024 03:19]
release. Once you look at the responses at the bottom of this article, you will find that almost all of the responses are based on established opinions accepted by the herd. Mainly negative opinions about Elon Musk are not accepted, nor are other opinions. But why is this? Don’t you belong then? Is it for points? Who decides if you don’t belong? If your opinion differs, should the different opinion necessarily be evaluated negatively? The proof is actually right there in front of you.
“Coffee buff. Twitter fanatic. Tv practitioner. Social media advocate. Pop culture ninja.”
More Stories
Strong increase in gas export pipeline from Norway to Europe
George Louis Bouchez still puts Julie Tatton on the list.
Thai Air Force wants Swedish Gripen 39 fighter jets